Google says antitrust report features ‘outdated and inaccurate allegations’

Spread the love

Update, October 6, 2020 (8:25 pm ET): Apple has responded, saying that it “vehemently disagrees” with the report and that developers are the “primary beneficiaries” of the App Store.

Update, October 7, 2020 (12:00 pm ET): Google has released a statement on the report.

Reported by CNBC, a Democratic congressional staff report, after its 16-month antitrust investigation which included the testimonies of some of the biggest CEOs in the technology industry, is recommending major changes to antitrust laws that could have major impacts to companies like Apple, Amazon, Facebook, and Google.

According to the report, the staff found that each of the four businesses currently has “monopoly power” that needs to be brought under control by Congress and other government agencies.

These 17 Amazon Prime Day deals are available right now to purchase

CNBC has outlined the major recommendations contained in the 450-page report, which include the potential breakup of some of the company’s businesses. For example, Google could have to break YouTube out into its own company.

  • Imposing structural separations and prohibiting dominant platforms from entering adjacent lines of business. This means that the Democratic staff recommends solutions including forcing tech companies to be broken up or imposing business structures that make different lines of business functionally separate from the parent company. For example, this could include a scenario like forcing Google to divest and separate from YouTube, or for Facebook to do the same with Instagram and WhatsApp. Subcommittee Chairman David Cicilline, D-R.I. has previously referred to this method as a type of “Glass-Steagall” law for the internet, referring to the 1930s era law that separated commercial from investment banking.
  • Instructing antitrust agencies to presume mergers by dominant platforms to be anticompetitive, shifting the burden onto the merging parties to prove their deal would not harm competition, rather than making enforcers prove it would.
    Preventing dominant platforms from preferencing their own services, instead making them offer “equal terms for equal products and services.”
  • Requiring dominant firms to make their services compatible with competitors and allow users to transfer their data.
  • Overriding “problematic precedents” in antitrust case law.
  • Requiring the Federal Trade Commission to regularly collect data on concentration.
  • Increase budgets for the FTC and Department of Justice Antitrust Division.
  • Strengthen private enforcement by eliminating forced arbitration clauses and limits on class action lawsuits.

The committee has specifically pointed out Apple’s control over the distribution of apps on iOS, a point that is sure to cause eyes to gaze over at its current legal battle with Epic Games, which seems to be heading to the court in 2021. The report also points out Amazon’s control over its marketplace, Facebook’s control over its advertising, and Google’s dominance in online search.

The Democratic report found that the four tech companies enjoy monopoly power in the following areas:

  • Apple: distribution of software apps on iOS devices.
  • Amazon: most third-party sellers and many suppliers.
  • Facebook: online advertising and social networking.
  • Google: online search.

Apple, Google, and Facebook have not yet responded to request for comment on the report. A spokesperson for Amazon has responded to the news, saying that the findings are “flawed thinking.”

“All large organizations attract the attention of regulators, and we welcome that scrutiny. But large companies are not dominant by definition, and the presumption that success can only be the result of anti-competitive behavior is simply wrong. And yet, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, those fallacies are at the core of this regulatory spit-balling on antitrust. This flawed thinking would have the primary effect of forcing millions of independent retailers out of online stores, thereby depriving these small businesses of one of the fastest and most profitable ways available to reach customers. For consumers, the result would be less choice and higher prices. Far from enhancing competition, these uninformed notions would instead reduce it.”

You can read the full report here.

Leave a Reply