Apple Allegedly Buys Ads for Subscription-Based Apps to Collect More Commission
Apple allegedly buys Google ads for popular subscription-based third-party apps to bolster its collection of commission on in-app purchases, according to an investigation by Forbes.
Apple has purportedly been buying Google ads for subscription-based third-party apps, including HBO, Masterclass, Babbel, Tinder, Plenty of Fish, and Bumble, for at least two years. A marketer speaking to Forbes suggested that many of the brands Apple appears to be advertising for have been assertive about attempting to circumvent App Store policies. The ads are said to be placed without the developer’s consent and Google apparently refuses to remove them.
The ads do not disclose that they are paid for by Apple, but redirect to the App Store rather than subscription sign-up pages on the brand’s website. One source, speaking to Forbes, explained:
Apple is trying maximize the money they’re making by driving in-app purchases that people buy through the Apple Store. Apple has figured out that they can make more money off these developers if they push people to the App Store to purchase there versus a web flow.
Ads encouraging users to subscribe to a service usually lead to pages that encourage users to sign up online, bypassing Apple’s 15 or 30 percent in-app purchase fee and allowing the business to collect all of the subscription’s revenue.
Google claims that it is not responsible for who buys ads on its platform. Google’s ad policies allow companies to use another company’s trademark if “primarily dedicated to selling (or clearly facilitating the sale of) products or services, components, replacement parts, or compatible products or services corresponding to the trademark.”
There are apparently indications that Apple is hiring a single agency to place the ads since they each have “similar tracking links with near-identical parameters.”
Forbes speculates that Apple’s unsolicited ads are potentially losing some third-party apps millions of dollars in revenue and resulting in high customer acquisition and advertising costs for their own campaigns, since prices rise when multiple parties bid on the same ad slots. The practice amounts to “a form of ad arbitrage,” according to Forbes.